民事诉讼中“新证据”问题研究

民事诉讼中“新证据”问题研究(论文10000字)
摘    要
民事诉讼中关于新的证据问题的阐述，以及其历史沿革。在我国民事诉讼的发展历程中，实体公正一直是人们不懈追求的价值目标。“新证据”作为举证时限的例外，是受追求实体公正的思想影响的结果。笔者结合自己的审判实践作为法律硕士论文选题进行写作的。本论文以新的证据的概念、特征为主线，通过对有关新的证据材料的分析，归纳得出新的证据的概念，并总结了新的证据的时限性、客观性、可信性与对
案件事实及裁判结果的主导性、决定性等四大法律特征我国现行《民事诉讼法》采用的是证据随时提出主义，对于证据的提出时间没有限制，“新证据”可以随时提出，由此产生了很多弊端。本文的写作采取了比较研究与理论分析相结合的方式，借鉴新证据美国、德国、日本、台湾、澳门的有关研究。分析我国新证据的问题现状以及不足，在民事诉讼中一审、二审、再审中存在的问题以及不足。对新证据的正当性危机和缺乏配套制度的评析。完善我国新证据的总体思路和具体设想，以及在一审、二审、再审中的具体方案和完善相应的配套制度。因此，对现行的制度进行改造，建立完善的“新证据”十分必要。

[资料来源：http://THINK58.com]

关键词：证据；新证据；民事诉讼；规则；制度
 
ABSTRACT
This paper expounds on the problems of the new evidence in civil litigation, and its historical evolution. In the course of development of China's civil litigation, substantive justice has been the relentless pursuit of the value target. The "new evidence" as the exception of proof limitation is influenced by thought of substantive justice of the result. The author combines own trial practice as a master of law thesis writing. In this paper, the concept of new evidence, the characteristics as the main line, through the analysis of the relevant materials of the new concept, summed up the new evidence, and summarizes the new evidence is limited, objectivity, credibility and on the leading case facts and judgment, and decisive four legal characteristics of China's current "Civil Procedure Law is used in evidence at any time, for evidence of no time limit, the" new evidence "can be made at any time, resulting in a lot of drawbacks. This paper adopts comparative study and theoretical analysis the combination of new evidence, from the United States, Germany, Japan, Taiwan, Macao. The related research status analysis of new evidence in our country, in the civil procedure of first instance, the second trial, the retrial in the existing problems and deficiencies. Comments on the new evidence of the legitimacy crisis and the lack of perfect our supporting system. China The overall ideas and specific ideas of the new evidence, as well as in the first instance, the second instance, the retrial of the specific programs and improve the corresponding supporting system, therefore, the transformation of the existing system, the establishment of a sound "new evidence" is necessary. [资料来源：http://think58.com]

Keywords：Evidence；New evidence；Civil litigation；Rules；System

目    录
第一章  引言    1
第二章  民事诉讼“新证据”问题概述    2
  2.1 “新证据”概念    2
  2.2 “新证据”历史沿革    3
第三章  民事诉讼“新证据”问题其他地区研究    4
  3.1 美国    4
  3.2 德国    4
  3.3 日本    4
  3.4 台湾和澳门    5
第四章  我国民事诉讼“新证据”制度现状    6
  4.1 民事诉讼对现行“新证据”的规定    6
    4.1.1 制度的正当性危机    6
    4.1.2 配套制度的缺乏    6
  4.2 民事诉讼在《证据规定》中对“新证据”的相关规定    7
    4.2.1 一审中的“新证据”    7
    4.2.2 二审中的“新证据”    7
    4.2.3 再审中的“新证据”    7
第五章  我国民事诉讼“新证据”规则的完善    8
  5.1 完善“新证据”规则的总体思路    8
  5.2 完善相应的配套制度    8
  5.3 完善“新证据”规则的具体设想    9
第六章  结论    11
参考文献    12
致    谢    13

[资料来源：http://think58.com]